2004
- QS World University Rankings launch in October 2004
2005
- Employer Reputation is added in 2005. The weighting on Academic Reputation is dropped from 50% to 40% to make way for the new indicator
- Introduced Mardev as a key source of Academic Responses
2006
- Individual fact files are distributed for the first time, giving institutions advanced warning of the news to come
- Invited institutions to supply lists of employers for us to be included in the Employer Survey
2007
- Switch to Scopus from Thomson’s Essential Science Indicators for publication and citation data. Broader journal coverage means more institutions than ever are reflected in our citations analysis
- Survey respondents are prevented from responding on behalf of their own institution
- Definitions are standardized to require Full Time Equivalent (FTE/EFTS) data for all faculty and student submissions
- Indicators are normalized for the first time to ensure fair and consistent application of weightings
2008
- QS SAFE – National System Strength Analysis released for the first time
- Domestic and international responses separated in survey analysis
2009
- QS Classifications released for the first time using alpha-numeric notation to group institutions by size, focus and research intensity
- Switched to Qualtrics for survey delivery, implemented AJAX “type to search” questions
- Implemented Academic Sign-up Facility to invite academics to volunteer to participate in Academic Survey
- Inaugural QS Asian University Rankings published
2010
- QS Core launched, a new custom built system designed to help gather and manage data submissions from universities
- Classifications refined for increased versatility and readability
- Damping mechanism applied to eliminate swings beyond certain thresholds
- Cap of 50% applied to international indicators
- Scaling adjusted to reduce volatility amongst the lower ranked institutions
- Invited institutions to supply lists of academics to augment the academic survey
- Established International Advisory Board
2011
- Released rankings at a discipline level (26 subjects) for the first time
- Dropped World Scientific as a key channel for academic respondents
- Self-citations excluded for the first time
- Survey weightings refined to control outlying response levels at a country level
- Academic respondents from a given institution (who cannot respond for that institution) excluded from the calculation of domestic reputation
- Age metric added to QS Classifications
- QS SAFE extended to embrace institutions in the top 700
- Inaugural QS University Rankings – Latin America launched






