Refinement Chronology

2004

  • QS World University Rankings launch in October 2004

2005

  • Employer Reputation is added in 2005. The weighting on Academic Reputation is dropped from 50% to 40% to make way for the new indicator
  • Introduced Mardev as a key source of Academic Responses

2006

  • Individual fact files are distributed for the first time, giving institutions advanced warning of the news to come
  • Invited institutions to supply lists of employers for us to be included in the Employer Survey

2007

  • Switch to Scopus from Thomson’s Essential Science Indicators for publication and citation data. Broader journal coverage means more institutions than ever are reflected in our citations analysis
  • Survey respondents are prevented from responding on behalf of their own institution
  • Definitions are standardized to require Full Time Equivalent (FTE/EFTS) data for all faculty and student submissions
  • Indicators are normalized for the first time to ensure fair and consistent application of weightings

2008

  • QS SAFE – National System Strength Analysis released for the first time
  • Domestic and international responses separated in survey analysis

2009

  • QS Classifications released for the first time using alpha-numeric notation to group institutions by size, focus and research intensity
  • Switched to Qualtrics for survey delivery, implemented AJAX “type to search” questions
  • Implemented Academic Sign-up Facility to invite academics to volunteer to participate in Academic Survey
  • Inaugural QS Asian University Rankings published

2010

  • QS Core launched, a new custom built system designed to help gather and manage data submissions from universities
  • Classifications refined for increased versatility and readability
  • Damping mechanism applied to eliminate swings beyond certain thresholds
  • Cap of 50% applied to international indicators
  • Scaling adjusted to reduce volatility amongst the lower ranked institutions
  • Invited institutions to supply lists of academics to augment the academic survey
  • Established International Advisory Board

2011

  • Released rankings at a discipline level (26 subjects) for the first time
  • Dropped World Scientific as a key channel for academic respondents
  • Self-citations excluded for the first time
  • Survey weightings refined to control outlying response levels at a country level
  • Academic respondents from a given institution (who cannot respond for that institution) excluded from the calculation of domestic reputation
  • Age metric added to QS Classifications
  • QS SAFE extended to embrace institutions in the top 700
  • Inaugural QS University Rankings – Latin America launched
Leave a Reply

  • QSAIM.com
  • QSAIM.com